How Do Consumers Evaluate Brand Extensions-Research Findings from India (Record no. 30053)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02021pab a2200205 454500
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 140923b0 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency Welingkar Institute of Management Development & Research, Mumbai
Original cataloging agency Welingkar Institute of Management Development & Research, Mumbai
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title ENG
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number
Item number Tha
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Thamaraiselvan N
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title How Do Consumers Evaluate Brand Extensions-Research Findings from India
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement 1
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. Apr-Sep 2008
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 0
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 43-62 Pp.
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Volume/sequential designation 8
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. In today's intense competitive environment, companies launch new products to satisfy constantly changing consumers' preferences. The new products are prone to failures due to many factors. Companies take efforts to reduce new product failure rates to maximize their returns for their stakeholders. A brand extension, leveraging existing brand names to new product categories is one such strategy to reduce the risk of new product failures. Despite two decades of research in branding, many vagaries are yet to be explored and understood. This study primarily focuses on how consumers evaluate brand extensions for FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) and service product categories in Indian market conditions. It explores how exactly the consumers evaluate different product categories based on factors like, similarity fit, perceived quality, brand reputation and perceived risk. It brings out the impact of brand reputation of the core brand and perceived service quality on the brand extensions evaluations. It highlights the role of perceived risk involved in the extended product category in brand extensions evaluations. Most importantly, this study establishes the relationships among similarity fit, brand reputation, perceived service quality and perceived risk in extended product categories through appropriate multivariate analysis.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Consumers Behaviour, Brand Extensions
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="http://192.168.6.13/libsuite/mm_files/Articles/AR10203.pdf">http://192.168.6.13/libsuite/mm_files/Articles/AR10203.pdf</a>
906 ## - LOCAL DATA ELEMENT F, LDF (RLIN)
a 29559
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Cost, normal purchase price Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Cost, replacement price Price effective from Koha item type
        Main Library Main Library 15/01/2009 0.00   Tha AR10203 23/09/2014 0.00 23/09/2014 Articles

Powered by Koha