000			01435pab a2200205 454500
008			140923b0 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cWelingkar Institute of Management Development & Research, Mumbai _aWelingkar Institute of Management Development & Research, Mumbai
041			_aENG
082			_a _bAug
100			_aAugier Mie
245			_aPursuit of Relevance in Management Education
250			_a3
260			_a _bSpring 2007 _c0
300			_a129-146 Pp.
490			_v49
520			_aThe article examines the debate over the appropriate character of management education in university-level business schools. The debate is found characterized by a constant struggle between those who fear academic purity has compromised the relevance of the education offered, and those who fear focusing on short-term problems limits the teaching of fundamental knowledge and the value of research. This debate takes place within all graduate-level professional schools no matter the discipline. All parties agree that synthesizing and balancing experiential and academic knowledge is the ideal solution to the argument, but practical means of achieving the goal remain elusive. The enduring conflict between the advocates of academic and empirical knowledge may well be the synthesize the debaters seek
650			_aManagement Education,
856			_uhttp://192.168.6.13/libsuite/mm_files/Articles/AR8827.pdf
906			_a25691
999			_c28728 _d28728